Public

Public

Cowardly Editors Allowed Themselves To Be Bullied Into Requiring Inaccurate Pronouns

There’s nothing respectful or ethical about misrepresenting a person’s sex

Michael Shellenberger's avatar
Michael Shellenberger
Aug 24, 2026
∙ Paid
Matt Brittin, Chair of the BBC; Katherine Maher, CEO of NPR; Daisy Veerasingham, CEO of AP (GETTY IMAGES)

News media organizations in the United States and the United Kingdom believe it is factually accurate and ethical to refer to people by the pronouns they prefer. The Associated Press Stylebook says that it recognizes “the need for a pronoun for people who don’t identify as a he or a she” and instructs journalists to use neither “biological sex” nor “both sexes,” since not everyone identifies with male or female. The BBC’s news style guide states that “We generally use the term and pronoun preferred by the person in question, unless there are editorial reasons not to do so.”

In fact, it is wrong for journalists to use inaccurate pronouns. Pronouns in English carry information about sex, and readers understand “she” to mean a female. A man who identifies as a woman remains male, because sex is encoded in our DNA and no amount of hormones or surgery can change that.

Public is an entirely reader-supported publication. Now, more than ever, we need your support to do our groundbreaking investigative journalism and defend free speech.

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2026 Michael Shellenberger · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture