Public

Public

Australia’s Prime Minister Threatens Relationship With Trump Over New Demands For Sweeping Censorship To Counter Critics Of Mass Migration

In an effort to silence his critics, Albanese’s government has introduced legislation to require social media platforms to remove anything that “may cause serious harm”

Michael Shellenberger's avatar
Michael Shellenberger
Sep 09, 2026
∙ Paid
United States President Donald Trump greets the Prime Minister of Australia Anthony Norman Albanese at the White House in Washington DC, United States on October 20, 2025. (Photo by Celal Gunes/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Since Donald Trump returned to the White House, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has courted the American president and boasted of the results. In October 2025, the two men signed a critical minerals framework at the White House. Albanese told reporters that “our historic critical minerals framework is going to see us break new ground together” and that “this means more jobs in Australia, it means more resilience for our economy.” He described the meeting as “as warm and friendly as you saw.”The framework commits the two governments to “a combined $3 billion towards an $8.5 billion future pipeline of priority critical minerals projects in Australia.”

But on Monday the Albanese government introduced draft legislation that would let the government impose sweeping censorship on American social media platforms, including X, owned by Trump ally Elon Musk, and perhaps even on Americans, for practically any reason whatsoever, with the transparent intention of silencing rising public opposition to mass migration. One section lets the government censor “any other material or conduct” that the Communications Minister “is satisfied may cause serious harm.”

That could, in practice, be anything, including criticisms of mass migration and Muslim migrants following terrorist attacks, like the one last December when a father and son, inspired by the Islamic State, killed 15 people, including a 10-year-old girl, rabbis, and a Holocaust survivor, at Bondi Beach, a popular site for Jewish Australians, during an annual celebration of Chanukah by the Sea. Australians who complain that migrants bring terrorism could find themselves censored by social media platforms under orders from the government. A platform facing an up to A$109.2 million penalty has every incentive to suppress posts about protests that involved any unlawful act.

Girls react as they leave the site of a shooting incident at Bondi Beach in Sydney on December 14, 2025. (Photo by Saeed KHAN / AFP via Getty Images)

In July, the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA) presciently warned that the Bondi tragedy was being used by the government “as an excuse for internet censorship and surveillance.” Albanese has already said One Nation, a right-wing populist party in the mold of AfD and RN in Germany and France, would “peddle misinformation and disinformation.” When asked about whether the legislation would allow her to censor misinformation, Communications Minister Anika Wells said, “We can emphatically rule that out.” But the legislation would allow her to censor anything that “may cause serious harm.” Last year the Albanese government claimed anti-mass migration protesters were linked to neo-Nazis.

This could upset the Trump administration, which has made defending American social media platforms and free speech a high priority.

Please subscribe now to support Public’s defense of free speech and to read the rest of the article.

Groups organized via social media gather to protest the government's immigration policies in Melbourne, Australia on August 31, 2025. Carrying Australian flags and banners, the protesters called for stricter border controls. (Photo by Recep Sakar/Anadolu via Getty Images)

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2026 Michael Shellenberger · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture